Connecting the Dots

“Someone would have talked.” “You couldn’t have kept such a huge operation like that quiet.”

We’ve heard all those excuses for the official story so many times, despite the fact that many people have talked, despite the obvious truth that yes, our government and National security state do, routinely, pull off highly complex operations, often without our knowledge at all, only sometimes discovered long afterwards–by which I don’t just mean deliberate cover-ups, but relatively “legitimate” operations like legally-authorized forms of intelligence collection, research programs, and military operations. Remember a little thing called the Manhattan Project–much, much larger and more complex than 9/11 would have been, and kept 100% secret? Yes, they can do that. Yes, they are capable of such things. “Incompetence” is only a defense is you can prove it, and nobody’s proven that at all.

And people have talked.

In the midst of researching other things, I happened to run across two fairly chilling items that brought to my attention new evidence about 9/11 and why and how it may have happened. The first is a YouTube video that expands in part on the testimony of 9/11 whistleblower (“someone would have talked”) Richard Grove, an executive at Marsh & McLennan, who was late for an almost unbelievably-timed meeting to discuss wide-scale corruption in government contracts–in a room on the floor in Tower 1 when the planes hit. Along with all the other whistleblowers, but not the senior executive who was supposed to be taking their claims seriously, he was supposed to have been killed that morning. He survived by chance. His entire testimony will light your hair on fire, and it connects with too many provable facts to be dismissed by any conventional means. It also connects the financial and software operations behind planning 9/11 to the technical and corporate means necessary to carry it out.  In the video, pay particular attention to a 9/11 event almost nobody notices: the destruction of WTC building 6. Yes, 6.

Secondly, a 2011 piece of thorough investigative reporting by the indefatigable Russ Baker connecting many of the 9/11 hijackers directly to the Bush family and the Saudi Royal family through that “nothing to see here” 9/11 location, South Florida. It’s not quite as hair-raising as the video or Grove’s story, but it all goes to connecting the pattern of dots here that becomes clearer and clearer as time goes by–if you are willing to see.

“I Think This Record Ought to Be Destroyed”

Discovered while researching other things: Allen Dulles suggests that the Warren Commission should destroy its record of a line of reasoning that suggests on its face that the FBI is constructing a false story about LHO (from the House Select Committee on Assassination records, Appendix Volume XI):

Mr. RANKIN. I thought first you should know about it. Second, there is this defector to that is somewhat an issue in this case, and I suppose you are all aware of it. That is that the FBI is very explicit that Oswald is the assassin or was the the assassin, and they are very explicit that there was no conspiracy, and they are also saying in the same place that they are continuing their investigation. Now in my experience of almost 9 years, in the first place it is hard to get them to say when you think you have got a case tight enough to convict somebody, that that is the person that committed the crime. In my experience with the FBI they don’t do that. They claim that they don’t do that. Second, they have not run out of all kinds of leads in Mexico or in Russia and so forth which they could probably *** they haven’t run out all the leads on the information and they could probably say–that isn’t our business. *** But they are concluding there can’t be a conspiracy without those being run out. Now that is not (normal) from my experience with the FBI***. Why are they so eager to make both of those conclusions *** the original report and their experimental report, which is such a departure. Now that is just circumstantial evidence, and it doesn’t prove anything about this, but it raises questions. We have to try to find out what they haven’t said that would give any support to the story, and report it to you***.
When the Chief Justice and I were just briefly reflecting on this we said if that was true and it ever came out and could be established, then you would have people think that there was a conspiracy to accomplish this assassination that nothing the Commission did or anybody could dissipate.

Representative BOGGS. You are so right.

Mr. DULLES. Oh, terrible.

Representative BOGGS. Its implications of this are fantastic, don’t you think so?

CHAIRMAN. Terrific.

Mr. RANKIN. To have anybody admit to it, even if it was the fact, I am sure that there wouldn’t at this point be anything to prove it.

Mr. DULLES. Lee, if this were true, why would it be particularly in their interest–I could see it would be in their interest to get rid of this man but why would it be in their interest to say he is clearly the only guilty one? I mean I don’t see that argument that you raise particularly shows an interest***.

Mr. RANKIN. They would like to have us fold up and quit.

Reprensentative BOGGS. This closes the case, you see. Don’t you see?

Mr. DULLES. Yes, I see that.

Mr. RANKIN. They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and we can go on home and that is the end of it.

Mr. DULLES. But that puts the burden right on them. If he was not the killer, and they employed him, they are already it, you see. So your argument is correct if they are sure that this is going to close the case, but if it don’t close the case, they are worse off than ever by doing this.

Representative BOGGS. Yes, I would think so. And of course, we are all even gaining in the realm of speculation I don’t even like to see this being taken down.

Mr. DULLES. Yes. I think this record ought to be destroyed. Do you think we need a record of this? (143)

a short science-fiction story

it is the year 2012.

the world is literally burning up. cities are flooding.

surveillance and the economy have both gone crazy. in the hands of some powerful individuals, many of society’s basic supports have been eradicated. fear is spreading. the ranks of the poor and homeless are growing.

in hidden compounds, the ultra-powerful manipulate events, both media events and “real” ones, to escape the coming catastrophe.

their main goal, like all super-powerful elites before them, is to take as much as they can for themselves before it happens. as much as they can of everything.

they manipulate political parties in the US to allow direct extraction of all resources from land once thought a part of public heritage.

they work to extract every sort of energy and precious resource around the world.

they stoke the work of health and technology companies to build toys and tools whose fundamental goal is all too clear: to enable them to survive

when the rest of us go.


and the few of us that can try to take back whatever we can of what the K. brothers, the CFR, & the other real NWO elites have stripped from 99.9% of the rest of us.

it’s what Michelle Bachmann is trying to enable. so was Herman Cain. so are many others. they keep to this narrative as if they knew it and could almost espouse it in private.

Eric Cantor. the Tea Party in general. the anti-Global Warming propagandists the world over. The promoters of the Euro. Even, at a creepy level, Obama and Geithner.

something is coming. whatever it is, i think, is going to turn out to characterize our age in a way to make September 11 appear not only as prologue–but may somehow expose its fictional status in favor of a new and more awful reality(/”reality”).

say no more

in the latest and perhaps most revealing in a series of single-shot stories that make the whole official 9/11 thing hard to swallow,

In what amounts to a fight over who gets to write the history of the Sept. 11 attacks and their aftermath, the Central Intelligence Agency is demanding extensive cuts from the memoir of a former F.B.I. agent who spent years near the center of the battle against Al Qaeda.

The agent, Ali H. Soufan, argues in the book that the C.I.A. missed a chance to derail the 2001 plot by withholding from the F.B.I. information about two future 9/11 hijackers living in San Diego, according to several people who have read the manuscript.

(Scott Shane, “C.I.A. Demands Cuts in Book About 9/11 and Terror Fight,” New York Times, Aug 25, 2011)

“missed a chance to derail the attack.” yet another chance. <bittersarcasm>fortunately, they fired the guy who kept saying “nothing to see here” over and over again when numerous top agents told him to place specific watches against specific, known terrorists operating inside the US, which would easily have made their subsequent activities visible to both agencies.</bittersarcasm>

instead, in one of the little-known and eeriest parts of the post 9/11 procedures, the purported illegality of sharing information across the cia/fbi boundary–or what is to say, the necessary and legal and deliberately legislated separation of foreign and domestic intelligence, but which has always and in virtually every case been breakable by quiet but recorded and legal activity of the executive, legislature and judiciary–made it “impossible” to put these pieces together.

because anyone looking even cursorily at the label “al qaeda” and the various red alert intelligence reports saw a clear pattern.

which they repeatedly order their subordinates to stop investigating and stop tracking.

“someone would have talked”: and when they did, the cia would come right out and edit the facts, even if they are pretty well known already.

also, hearing reports of what sounds like an important new book that is oriented toward showing, simply, that the official version of the record cannot be true, period, The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11 and Osama bin Laden.




better call in the tea party investigators

there can’t be any truth to this. anyway, let’s get the tea party to work on it before people start to speculate. it’ll turn out there never was a JFK, let alone an LBJ, let alone a US of A before 1991, or before Ronald Reagan, aka Jesus Christ.

Jacqueline Kennedy-Onassis believed Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the assassination of her husband, according to tapes recorded by the former first lady just months after President John F. Kennedy’s death, the Daily Mail reports.

The tapes, which are set to be released by ABC News, reportedly reveal that Kennedy-Onassis believed then-vice president Johnson, along with businessmen in the South, planned the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of her husband in Dallas, Texas.

Read more:


here’s a theory.

this story is not primarily about — or should i say “limited to” — newspapers. and any danger of that leaking out will be stopped, by any means necessary.

News of the World phone-hacking whistleblower found dead
Death of Sean Hoare – who was first named journalist to allege Andy Coulson knew of hacking – not being treated as suspicious
Amelia Hill, James Robinson and Caroline Davies, Monday 18 July 2011 18.04 BST

Hoare, who said he was once a close friend of Coulson’s, told the New York Times the two first worked together at the Sun, where, Hoare said, he played tape recordings of hacked messages for Coulson. At the News of the World, Hoare said, he continued to inform Coulson of his activities. Coulson “actively encouraged me to do it”, Hoare said.

In September last year he was interviewed under caution by police over his claims that the former Tory communications chief asked him to hack into phones when he was editor of the paper, but declined to make any comment.


yep, yep, yep.

the real world peels back the veil for just a second.

a permanent drugs & sex business. do we know anyone who likes to have a hand in that?

Maid cleaning up as ‘hooker’: Big tips for extra ‘turndown service’–Prosecutors list litany of lies, scams


The New York Post, 9:20 AM, July 2, 2011

Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s accuser wasn’t just a girl working at a hotel — she was a working girl.

The Sofitel housekeeper who claims the former IMF boss sexually assaulted her in his room was doing double duty as a prostitute, collecting cash on the side from male guests, The Post has learned.

“There is information . . . of her getting extraordinary tips, if you know what I mean. And it’s not for bringing extra f–king towels,” a source close to the defense investigation said yesterday.

The woman was allegedly purposely assigned to the Midtown hotel by her union because it knew she would bring in big bucks.

“When you’re a chambermaid at Local 6, when you first get to the US, you start at the motels at JFK [Airport]. You don’t start at the Sofitel,” the source said. “There’s a whole squad of people who saw her as an earner.”

Read more

you can stop now

seriously, i am entertained enough. you can stop it. you can not keep making it look like c. July 15, we are going to find out for realz what a “financial catastrophe i mean apocalypse” looks like.

the US govt needs to extend the debt limit. they need do it before july 15, not august 2. don’t keeping working on it all day, every day, shedding participants, and not getting anywhere.

the World Bank, the EU, and the people of Europe need to figure out how to fix the Greek crisis while recognizing that a more global solution to that mofo–which is also our mofo–is needed ASAP. The solution cannot be to take the few remaining assets of the least well-off, while asking less and less and giving more and more to the bankers.

or to put it in the words of very, very, very sober, non-paranoid types:

“We could actually have a reprise of a financial crisis,” the president told Ann Curry on the Today show. Mr. Bernanke warned Congress that “severe disruptions in financial markets and the payments system” are possible.

from a Forbes blog posting called “Financial Crisis II: Greece vs. the Debt Ceiling.” exactly.

“leakage” in scotland

just in time for your debt-ceiling-raising entertainment, this will probably not make the us evening news:

The boss of the Royal Bank of Scotland has conceded that taxpayers’ money could have gone towards bankers’ bonuses.

Stephen Hester was being grilled by the Treasury Select Committee over proposals to ringfence different banking operations when he admitted that there could have been some “leakage” from taxpayer support into the bonus pool.

full story: “RBS boss says taxpayers’ money could have gone to bankers’ bonuses,”, 08 jun 2011

also: Royal Bank of Scotland boss admits taxpayers’ money could have ‘leaked’ into bankers’ bonuses, Daily Mail 08 jun 2011

just in case you are interested

you may or may not find this relevant or interesting, but this entity called the “united states” for the first time in its history has in sight an actual number of days by which it had better solve what has become an insoluble financial crisis, or else, i dunno, go bust, which might also mean effectively dissolve as a political union. “obama last american president” and all that. or did the tea party not know that it was playing with fire when it started to raise questions of a revolutionary nature? maybe they’re planning to pull us back from the brink. or maybe they’ve decided that a federal government is too much overhead baggage for the Sixth Republic of Our Rich Overlords (whoever the eff they are).

wouldn’t it be nice if this weren’t serious.

instead, just as we are “learning” that bank of america was actually purposely managing the “mortgages” that underlay (or underlie) the finanical criss that the tea party b lames on the regulators and on everyone else, wall street crashed because it realized that the finacnial figures were turning out just as badly as many rational people had thought. then alan greenspan, not that he’s any expert, said that he is afraid of what may be about to happen.

i hate to say this but i have to.

if you have some precious metals, make sure you know where they are. buy some flour, rice, grains, sugar, salt, & other provisions. if i’m wrong, you can bake some cake.

if you think the tea party has any better idea of what they have done than they have about anythign else you are giving them too much credit.

folks,t he problem is, there is too much possibility that messrs. geithner, blankfein (speaking of someone on whom the heat is being turned up),want it to happen. that is part of the “truth about the american economy.”

it’s kind of like watching 9/11, come to think of it…watching hte US dissolve into a million pieces, while almost no one even sees what’s happening, & most of those who do, want it.